The Role and Threats of Using ChatGPT in Higher Education: Balancing Pedagogical Potential and Ethical Risks

Authors

  • Baiq Mulianah Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama NTB
  • Fadly Usman Universitas Brawijaya
  • Mauhibur Rokhman Universitas KH. Abdul Chalim
  • M. Alfin Fatikh Universitas KH. Abdul Chalim
  • Isni Andriana Universitas Sriwijaya
  • Meutia Aisyah Nabila Universitas Gadjah Mada
  • Mohammad Maulana Nur Kholis Universitas KH. Abdul Chalim

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31538/nzh.v8i3.218

Keywords:

ChatGPT, Higher Education, Academic Integrity, Digital Literacy, Ethical Use of AI

Abstract

The increasing use of generative AI tools in education highlights the need to understand how they can be effectively integrated into university-level teaching and learning. Although these tools offer great promise, the absence of a transparent and ethical framework for their implementation poses real challenges in aligning them with curriculum goals. AI technologies, such as ChatGPT, have already begun to reshape the way students learn, particularly in higher education settings. This research examines how students utilize ChatGPT for academic purposes, including studying, research, and learning activities. Using a quantitative approach, the study identifies usage trends and finds that students generally feel confident using ChatGPT, with many reporting improved engagement and productivity. The lack of regulated ethical standards for ChatGPT use and lecturer interventions prohibiting irresponsible use also impact the widespread use of ChatGPT in higher education settings. This study used quantitative data analysis involving 415 students from four universities: KH Abdul Chalim University, Brawijaya University, Sriwijaya University, and Gadjah Mada University. This research examines the benefits, challenges, and ethical considerations of utilising AI-based software in academic settings, particularly in higher education.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Fadly Usman, Universitas Brawijaya

Corresponding Authors

References

Akgun, S., & Greenhow, C. (2022). Artificial intelligence in education: Addressing ethical challenges in K-12 settings. AI and Ethics, 2(3), 431–440. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-021-00096-7

Al Husaeni, D. F., Al Husaeni, D. N., Nandiyanto, A. B. D., Rokhman, M., Chalim, S., Chano, J., Al Obaidi, A. Sh. M., & Roestamy, M. (2023). How Technology Can Change Educational Research? Definition, Factors for Improving Quality of Education and Computational Bibliometric Analysis. ASEAN Journal of Science and Engineering, 4(2), 127–166. https://doi.org/10.17509/ajse.v4i2.62045

Al Shloul, T., Mazhar, T., Abbas, Q., Iqbal, M., Ghadi, Y. Y., Shahzad, T., Mallek, F., & Hamam, H. (2024). Role of activity-based learning and ChatGPT on students’ performance in education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, 100219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100219

Alfredo, R., Echeverria, V., Jin, Y., Yan, L., Swiecki, Z., Gašević, D., & Martinez-Maldonado, R. (2024). Human-centred learning analytics and AI in education: A systematic literature review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, 100215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100215

Baig, M. I., & Yadegaridehkordi, E. (2024). ChatGPT in the higher education: A systematic literature review and research challenges. International Journal of Educational Research, 127, 102411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2024.102411

Boone, H., & Boone, D. (2012). Analyzing Likert Data. Journal of Extension, 50(2). https://doi.org/10.34068/joe.50.02.48

Chalim, S., Usman, F., Rokhman, M., Rusydi, I., Rahmat, & Zamawi, B. (2024). Children’s Education in the Metaverse Era: Between the Rapid Growth of Information Technology and Self-learning of Generation Z. Nazhruna: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 7(3), 608–627. https://doi.org/10.31538/nzh.v7i3.19

Cotton, D. R. E., Cotton, P. A., & Shipway, J. R. (2024). Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61(2), 228–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148

Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, L., Ismagilova, E., Aarts, G., Coombs, C., Crick, T., Duan, Y., Dwivedi, R., Edwards, J., Eirug, A., Galanos, V., Ilavarasan, P. V., Janssen, M., Jones, P., Kar, A. K., Kizgin, H., Kronemann, B., Lal, B., Lucini, B., … Williams, M. D. (2021). Artificial Intelligence (AI): Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 57, 101994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.08.002

Ellis, A. R., & Slade, E. (2023). A New Era of Learning: Considerations for ChatGPT as a Tool to Enhance Statistics and Data Science Education. Journal of Statistics and Data Science Education, 31(2), 128–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/26939169.2023.2223609

Farrokhnia, M., Banihashem, S. K., Noroozi, O., & Wals, A. (2024). A SWOT analysis of ChatGPT: Implications for educational practice and research. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61(3), 460–474. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2195846

Hu, W., & Shao, Z. (2025). Design and evaluation of a GenAI-based personalized educational content system tailored to personality traits and emotional responses for adaptive learning. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 19, 100735. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2025.100735

Huong, V. T. M., Hue, H. T. K., Chau, D. T. M., Nguyet, N. T. M., Quy, T. T., & Tri, N. Q. (2024). A dataset on analysis of school-based management research from 1984 TO 2023. Data in Brief, 56, 110823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2024.110823

Jamieson, S. (2004). Likert scales: how to (ab)use them. Medical Education, 38(12), 1217–1218. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.02012.x

Joshi, A., Kale, S., Chandel, S., & Pal, D. (2015). Likert Scale: Explored and Explained. British Journal of Applied Science & Technology, 7(4), 396–403. https://doi.org/10.9734/BJAST/2015/14975

Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., Krusche, S., Kutyniok, G., Michaeli, T., Nerdel, C., Pfeffer, J., Poquet, O., Sailer, M., Schmidt, A., Seidel, T., … Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274

Likert, R. (1932). A Technique for the Measurement of Attitudes (140th ed., Vol. 22). Archives of Psychology, New York University.

Lyu, W., & Salam, Z. A. (2025). AI-powered personalized learning: Enhancing self-efficacy, motivation, and digital literacy in adult education through expectancy-value theory. Learning and Motivation, 90, 102129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2025.102129

Rokhman, M., Usman, F., Usman, F., Kassim, A. B. H., & Muslihun, M. (2023). Consideration of Parents in Choosing Islamic Schools in the Digital Era. Nazhruna: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 6(3), 403–419. https://doi.org/10.31538/nzh.v6i3.4026

Susnjak, T., & McIntosh, T. (2024). ChatGPT: The End of Online Exam Integrity? Education Sciences, 14(6), 656. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14060656

Tlili, A., Shehata, B., Adarkwah, M. A., Bozkurt, A., Hickey, D. T., Huang, R., & Agyemang, B. (2023). What if the devil is my guardian angel: ChatGPT as a case study of using chatbots in education. Smart Learning Environments, 10(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00237-x

Usman, F., Murakami, K., Wijatmiko, I., Rokman, M., & Nabila, M. A. (2025). Role of Coastal Vegetation Belts in Mitigating Tsunami Waves: Bibliometric Analysis, Numerical, and Spatial Analysis. ASEAN Journal of Science and Engineering, 5(1), 31–44. https://doi.org/10.17509/ajse.v5i1.80281

Usman, F., Wardhani, J. K., Sari, I. C., & Chalim, S. (2023). Assessing Trauma Healing Methods for Volcanic Disaster Evacuees in Indonesia. Journal Européen Des Systèmes Automatisés, 56(6), 1019–1025. https://doi.org/10.18280/jesa.560612

Wang, H., Dang, A., Wu, Z., & Mac, S. (2024). Generative AI in higher education: Seeing ChatGPT through universities’ policies, resources, and guidelines. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, 100326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100326

Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0

Downloads

Published

2025-10-12

How to Cite

Mulianah, B., Usman, F., Rokhman, M., Fatikh, M. A., Andriana, I., Nabila, M. A., & Nur Kholis, M. M. (2025). The Role and Threats of Using ChatGPT in Higher Education: Balancing Pedagogical Potential and Ethical Risks. Nazhruna: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 8(3), 550–560. https://doi.org/10.31538/nzh.v8i3.218

Issue

Vol. 8 No. 3 (2025): Transformative Islamic Education

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Baiq Mulianah, Fadly Usman, Mauhibur Rokhman, M. Alfin Fatikh, Isni Andriana, Meutia Aisyah Nabila, Mohammad Maulana Nur Kholis

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.