Adaptive Scenario Planning for Madrasah Teacher Distribution in Greater Jakarta

Authors

  • Ajang Pradita Institut Pertanian Bogor
  • Mohamad Syamsul Ma’arif Institut Pertanian Bogor
  • Furqon Syarief Hidayatulloh Institut Pertanian Bogor
  • Briliantina Indrati Universitas Islam Depok
  • Widya Rahmawati Al-Nur Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31538/nzh.v9i2.532

Keywords:

Madrasah Teacher Distribution, Adaptive Planning, Scenario Planning, TAIDA Framework, Structural Equation Modeling, Educational Governanc

Abstract

Ensuring equitable teacher distribution remains a critical challenge in improving the quality of madrasah education in Indonesia, particularly in the Greater Jakarta (Jabodetabek) region. Existing allocation policies primarily rely on teacher–student ratios and often overlook institutional capacity, regional diversity, and contextual conditions. This study examines the factors influencing the effectiveness of madrasah teacher distribution and develops adaptive planning scenarios to support more responsive policy interventions. A quantitative research design was employed using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) to analyze the effects of individual, organizational, and external environmental factors on teacher distribution management. The findings were subsequently integrated with the TAIDA (Tracking, Analysis, Imaging, Deciding, Acting) framework to formulate adaptive scenario-based planning models. The results reveal that organizational factors have the strongest influence on the effectiveness of teacher distribution, followed by individual and external environmental factors. The study demonstrates that distribution challenges are shaped by the interaction of governance structures, human resource characteristics, and contextual conditions rather than by teacher availability alone. Three adaptive scenarios were developed, ranging from administrative approaches to systemic adaptive models emphasizing organizational capacity, evidence-based planning, and regional responsiveness. The study contributes to educational management literature by integrating empirical modeling with strategic foresight to support equitable, flexible, and sustainable teacher distribution policies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2021). Collaborative governance and adaptive governance in public administration. Oxford University Press.

Béteille, T., Kalogrides, D., & Loeb, S. (2020). Effective schools: Managing the recruitment, development, and retention of high-quality teachers. Educational Researcher, 49(1), 27–38. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X19891819

Bush, T. (2021). Theories of educational leadership and management: Current perspectives and future directions. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 49(1), 3–4. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143220985152

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Sage.

Darling-Hammond, L. (2022). Teacher quality, equity, and educational improvement. Teaching and Teacher Education, 115, 103735. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103735

Dessler, G. (2020). Human resource management (16th ed.). Pearson.

Dunn, W. N. (2018). Public policy analysis: An integrated approach (6th ed.). Routledge.

Fullan, M. (2022). The new meaning of educational change (6th ed.). Teachers College Press.

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.

Hallinger, P., & Kovačević, J. (2021). Mapping the intellectual lineage of educational management research. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 49(1), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143220935437

Howlett, M. (2023). Designing public policies: Principles and instruments (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Mason, M. (2021). Complexity theory and educational change: A systems perspective. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 53(10), 1025–1038. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2020.1835641

Nguyen, T. D., Pham, L. D., Crouch, M., & Springer, M. G. (2020). The correlates of teacher turnover: An updated and expanded meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 31, 100355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100355

OECD. (2024). Education at a glance 2024: OECD indicators. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/c00cad36-en

Peters, B. G. (2021). Advanced introduction to public policy. Edward Elgar Publishing.

Pont, B. (2021). Educational governance and system transformation. OECD Education Working Papers, 264, 1–48.

Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2022). Organizational behavior (19th ed.). Pearson.

Santiago, P., Benavides, F., Danielson, C., Goe, L., & Nusche, D. (2021). Teacher workforce planning and policy challenges: International perspectives. OECD Education Working Papers, 258.

Schleicher, A. (2023). World class: How to build a 21st-century school system. OECD Publishing.

UNESCO. (2023). Global education monitoring report 2023: Technology in education. UNESCO.

UNESCO. (2024). Global report on teachers: Addressing teacher shortages worldwide. UNESCO.

United Nations Development Programme. (2024). Human development report 2024. UNDP.

Wilkinson, A., & Kupers, R. (2022). Strategic foresight and scenario planning for public policy. Palgrave Macmillan.

World Bank. (2024). Teacher deployment and education service delivery in developing countries. World Bank.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-27

How to Cite

Pradita, A., Ma’arif, M. S., Hidayatulloh, F. S., Indrati, B., & Al-Nur, W. R. (2026). Adaptive Scenario Planning for Madrasah Teacher Distribution in Greater Jakarta. Nazhruna: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 9(2), 580–602. https://doi.org/10.31538/nzh.v9i2.532